This paper examines whether firms in non-competitive industries benefit relatively more from good governance than do firms in competitive industries. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that weak governance firms, as measured by the G-index, have lower equity returns, worse operating performance, and lower firm value, but only so in non-competitive industries. When we examine the nature of the underlying agency cost, we find that weak governance firms have lower labor productivity, higher input costs, and make more value-destroying acquisitions, but, again, only so in non-competitive industries. We also find that weak governance firms in non-competitive industries are more likely to be targeted by activist hedge funds, suggesting that investors are taking actions to mitigate the inefficiency.
«Nulla dies sine linea» "Spend each day trying to be a little wiser than you were when you woke up. Discharge your duties faithfully and well. Step by step you get ahead, but not necessarily in fast spurts. But you build discipline by preparing for fast spurts ... In the end, most people get what they deserve." Charlie Munger
Páginas
▼
sábado, 4 de septiembre de 2010
Si el mercado es muy competitivo, la calidad del gobierno corporativo es irrelevante
Mueller, Holger M., Corporate Governance, Product Market Competition and Equity Prices (April 21, 2010). Journal of Finance,
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario